Outside World and Dependencies - Test

One large swap can move the current price inside a single transaction and be swapped back right after

The current pool price is not stored on-chain

Reading the current price costs more compute than reading an average

The current price is always older than the average

An account already exists at the PDA derived from the proposal and the voter's token owner record

The proposal keeps a list of voters and searches it on every vote

The token owner record keeps a flag for every proposal it voted on

An off-chain indexer tells the program who has voted

It looks worse from both sides, so the user can borrow less and the liquidation line comes closer

Nothing changes, because the middle price did not move

It looks better, because the debt is also less certain

The position is liquidated at once

Refusing a liquidation is a risk too, because a position that cannot be liquidated keeps losing money for the protocol

Liquidators are trusted more than borrowers, so they need fewer checks

A liquidation does not use the oracle price at all

Borrows happen less often, so they can afford more compute for checks

A core action has to touch more accounts than one transaction can lock, and that number grows with the data

Solana's block time is too slow for a lending protocol

An L2 has stronger finality than Solana

Leaving an L2 is faster than entering it

A timelock on admin actions, so a change becomes visible before it takes effect

A larger confidence multiplier on every oracle price

Moving the exchange to an L2

Making each market's oracle an admin setting